Dr Scott and political correctness
The investigation against Christian GP Dr Richard Scott for talking about Jesus to a patient would not have been taken seriously by the General Medical Council were it not for our culture of ‘political correctness’.
We all know about the insidious effects of political correctness - how it controls people through creating a climate of fear and how it seeks to shape political and social discourse.
Throughout history, ideologues have sought to impose their views, and their power, onto others, and to control what people can and can’t believe. It is nothing new, and it is always opposed to the Gospel.
Political correctness in its modern form was developed, refined and promoted at the Institute of Social Research in Germany, which was founded in 1923. Later, the Institute moved to the USA. It was a Marxist organisation and it sought to spread Marxist ideology. The ‘thinkers’ at the Institute believed that Western Civilisation wasn’t embracing communism because of its strong belief in the individual, and individual thinking. This supposedly had to be torn down in order for Western Europeans to embrace Marxism.
If individualism and free thinking were to be brought down then speech and thought needed to be controlled. Thus political correctness has been used to control people by controlling language and attempting to change the way people think.
Political correctness propagates a particular social narrative based on grievance and power, and advances the belief that nothing you say must offend another, especially if that other can be identified as belonging to a victim group.
Being politically correct means subscribing to the fashionable, progressive political orthodoxy of the day. It is an orthodoxy based on the rejection of God and is utterly opposed to Christianity. It is totalitarian in nature and you are castigated if you do not subscribe to it. That’s why a doctor can get in trouble for talking about Jesus to a patient.
Britain is labouring, indeed groaning under this yoke. We have created a society in the UK where people are genuinely afraid of what they can and can’t say at work and where people lose their jobs for expressing Christian views (views which were considered mainstream until recently).
At the Christian Legal Centre we have many clients who have faced problems at work due to mentioning their faith, including Duke Amachree, Caroline Petrie, David Booker and Kwabena Peat. Mentioning Jesus is not politically correct!
Right now the screws are continuing to tighten in the public sector, and those with Christian views on sexual ethics in particular are going to find it harder and harder to maintain a faithful witness at work.
A recent high profile case was that of Christian Dr Hans-Christian Raabe,who was sacked by the Home office from its Drugs counsel because he had unfashionable views about sex and homosexuality. Then of course we have Eunice and Owen Johns, whose fostering application stalled because of thought crime – they would not agree to tell a hypothetical child aged 5 to 9 years old that practising homosexuality was a good thing. Thus, they were not fit to foster. In fact, their views were an infection that might harm a child.
A robust society values individuals and individual free thinking. We can’t let this virus of political correctness crush freedom in this nation. It will take huge courage to overcome it but it must be done. When are the British public going to realise that their society is being influenced by a totalitarian ideology that, in its modern form, explicitly came out of Marxism?
In the meantime, whilst under official investigation by the GMC, Dr Scott has been given lots of media airtime and has used it to speak about Jesus and articulate his right to freedom of belief at work.
We need more Dr Scotts.
Thankfully, the Lord is raising up Gideon’s men in this hour.
Andrea
BBC South East: News report on Dr Scott
BBC Radio 5 Live: Dr Scott discusses the place of Jesus in medical care
BBC Radio 2: Dr Scott discusses his case on the Jeremy Vine show
![]() |
Andrea is the CEO of Christian Concern and the Christian Legal Centre. She is married with four children. |
Latest Posts
-
11th May, 2012
-
26th April, 2012
-
19th April, 2012
-
4th April, 2012
-
16th March, 2012
-
16th February, 2012



Submitted by LydneyLass on 6th June, 2011.
NHS is not a Christian institution
I speak as both a Christian and a health care worker. Andrea, you've done such wonderful work in the past, but you're way off the mark on this one. The NHS is not a Christian institution and if we allow Christian doctors to express thier beliefs we'll have to let doctors of every other faith do the same - and I know an awful lot of Muslim doctors. No one likes to see Christianity suffer at the hands of political correctness, but we all need to step back an consider the wider picture here.
Submitted by Nunos on 29th May, 2011.
Blinkered
This typifies the blinkered views of some in society who have no grasp of history and a very narrow minded view of life today.
Our medicine is stooped in faith!
Can you imagine where we would be without Florence Nightingale? Can you imagine the "GMC" of her day blocking her revolution of nursing because she may mention Jesus or God at some point, or may even suggest that there is more to life than this frail human body?
The fact is, the no one in their right mind would advocate that humans are just a fleshy body that only has physical needs! So why must the medical profession only minister to physical needs, when they may have a means to meet their mental and spiritual needs?
Can you imagine no charity Barnardos? Because Dr Barnardo did what society failed to do, minister to the well being of orphans and homeless, and without doubt ministered more than providing a roof over their heads and food in their bellies! He did this because of his faith in God, who he believed caed for these children when no one else did.
Christians Against Poverty are changing lives all over the Nation as families riddled with debt face guilt, shame, and a burden they find no way out of, by providing help to become debt free. Does that mean life is purely about material goods? Of course not, which is why they may find the answer to the other cries of thier hearts beyond finance.
Anyone who denies faith in health and wellbeing and limits life to purely transactional matters, may as well deny courtesy, saying thank you and please, kindness, generosity, grace, mercy, forgiveness, sacrifice, honour and respect, because non of these are touched by medicine, yet these may lift a soul and spirit of a man, woman or child when all else has failed. Unless that denier has the answer, they have no right to deny others the opportunity to give it.
Submitted by kane on 30th April, 2012.
It is really surprising that,
It is really surprising that, successive governments in India have not realized the fact that there is no second prize in war .compare directories
Submitted by Books on 28th May, 2011.
Political correctness &the Institute for Social Research (ISR)
I am currently researching this topic. What you have written is fine but the point needs to be made that the Frankfurt School, the popular name for the ISR, was received into the bosom of the American Academic & Intelligence establishments as an ally against Fascism in the 1930s and has been infecting them both ever since. It had as its goal the destruction of western civilisation by criticising its basic institutions (Critical Theory) and by making eroticism 'respectable.' Marcuse in his Eros & Civilisation (1956) a book of his lectures at the Washington School of Psychiatry 1950-1 advocates working as little as possible, playing as much as possible and 'satisfying' Eros as much as possible. Coupled with Alfred Kinsey's so called research on human sexuality which depicted corrupted sexual behaviour as normal and Hugh Heffner's popularisation of his 'findings' in his magazine Playboy the west has been caught in a pincer movement. Academia, especially sociology, and the mass media have between them relentlessly attacked Judeo-Christian ethics.