Skip to content

Christian to ask Court of Appeal to overturn Employment Appeal Tribunal decision on Sunday working

Printer-friendly version

Issued on behalf of Christian Legal Centre

Press Release

For Immediate Release

20 OCTOBER 2013


Christian to ask Court of Appeal to overturn Employment Appeal Tribunal decision on Sunday working
 
A CHRISTIAN Children’s worker from London is taking The Mayor and the London Borough of Merton to the Court of Appeal this week (22 or 23 OCT) over their refusal to provide Reasonable Accommodation for her devoutly held Christian beliefs.  If successful, the case could be a benchmark for thousands of Christians in England now ‘forced’ to work on Sundays if they are to keep their jobs.
 
Using a recent European Court Judgment which stated that British Airways was wrong not to allow a worker to wear a Cross (even though not all Christians wear such items), and that employers should offer reasonable accommodation to workers’ spiritual beliefs, Celestina Mba will claim that her employer failed to accommodate her wish to be able to have a day of rest on the Sabbath, one of the 10 vital Commandments Christians were told by Jesus to follow.
 
Celestina Mba, a Christian children’s worker, had been told by an Employment Appeal Tribunal that her employer was justified in refusing to permit her not to work on a Sunday.  The judge said that Sunday was not a ‘core’ component of the Christian faith because some Christians would be prepared to work on a Sunday; and therefore Christians as a whole do not need Sunday protected.

However, before Celestina began working for Brightwell Children’s Home in London, she agreed with her employers that she would not work on Sundays in accordance with her Christian beliefs.  The Tribunal expressly found that Ms Mba thought that she genuinely believed that her religious position would be accommodated in full when she accepted the position in 2007. However, the Council changed the arrangement soon after she started the job, saying that the arrangement was temporary, forcing her to choose between her job and her Christian observance.

Celestina offered to work for less pay, or to work night or Saturday shifts, something unpopular with other employees, but the Council chose not to provide reasonable accommodation for her beliefs and forced Ms Mba to resign.
 
This week (22 or 23 OCT), at the Court of Appeal in London, Ms Mba’s legal advisers will use a recent ruling from the European Court of Human Rights which declared that it was not right in law for an employer to claim exemption from Human Rights on the ground that not all adherents to a faith carry out a certain practice (ie. working on Sundays), but that all employers should provide ‘reasonable accommodation’ for the deeply held spiritual beliefs of all employers.  If successful, the case will be seen as a legal benchmark and could radically change the rights of Christians to have their devoutly held beliefs recognised by their employers.
 
Andrea Minichiello Williams, barrister and founder of the Christian Legal Centre which is supporting the Christian, said: “Celestina’s case continues a trend where we are seeing secular Courts ruling on ‘core’ components of Christian practice. 

“However, the Courts have acted to protect the Kara bracelet, Afro ‘Cornrow haircuts’, the wearing of the Hijab and a Muslim’s right to fast, but have refused to grant protection to the Cross or the Christian Sunday.

 
“Celestina’s offer to work for less and work unpopular shifts, even when others had offered to work in her place on Sundays, was clearly a reasonable accommodation that her employer could, and should, have provided.”
 
Ms Mba will be represented in the Court of Appeal by the leading Human Rights barrister, Paul Diamond.
 
ENDS.
 
For further information/interview:
Andrea Minichiello Williams:  0771 259 1164
Peter Norris: 0796 844 4525

Twitter

  • ICYMI: "It's never in the best interests of a person for a doctor to help them kill themselves". Dr Peter Saunders… https://t.co/Mj2lLfTkwK 9 hours 29 min ago
  • "To see, or not to see, that is the question" - Jules Gomes looks at the hypocrisy in reactions to graphic imagery… https://t.co/YH4BIhauWt 11 hours 2 sec ago
  • "Slippery slopes and incremental expansion" - Dr Peter Saunders was interviewed by BBC Radio Coventry & Warwickshir… https://t.co/FFwwPNKlAP 14 hours 6 min ago
  • Tim Dieppe spoke to LBC's Nick Ferrari about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome, raising ethical con… https://t.co/mPQT3mjpWq 17 hours 4 min ago
  • "It's never in the best interests of a person for a doctor to help them kill themselves". Dr Peter Saunders spoke t… https://t.co/QmbXNoHIQ8 19 hours 22 min ago

Subscribe to our emails