Skip to content

Government 'promoting further abortion liberalisation, by the backdoor’

Printer-friendly version

Issued on behalf of Christian Concern & Christian Legal Centre

Press Release

For Immediate Release

16 January 2014


Government 'promoting further abortion liberalisation, by the backdoor’ 

Draft regulations published by the Government have been labelled as ‘dangerous and dishonest’ and an ‘attempt to further undermine protections built into the Abortion Act’ by ‘further removing doctors from the process of abortion and face to face contact with women’.
 
The document relates to the ‘required standard operating procedures’ that govern the practice of private abortion providers. It was published without widespread notification before Christmas by the Department of Health. The consultation was due to close tomorrow (17 JAN) but following ‘an administrative error’ that saw different dates published for the deadline, the closing date has been extended to 3rd February.
 
The proposals suggest that whilst it is ‘good practice’ that at least one doctor sees a woman considering abortion, ‘this is not a legal requirement’.
 
They also suggest that non-doctors may carry out the abortion procedure – for example, ‘[administering] the drugs used for medical abortions’ - as long as a doctor ‘decides upon, initiates and takes responsibility throughout the process’.
 
“Putting further distance between doctors and women considering abortion flies in the face of the spirit and letter of the 1967 Abortion Act that put strong protections in place for the sake of women,” according to Andrea Williams, Chief Executive of the Christian Legal Centre.
 
The 1967 Act exempts doctors from prosecution when a ‘pregnancy is terminated by a registered medical practitioner if two registered practitioners are of the opinion, formed in good faith’ that the situation meets one of the grounds laid out in the Act.
 
“How can doctors be reaching an opinion in ‘good faith’ when neither of them have actually met with the patient? And how can it be claimed that the pregnancy has been terminated by a doctor when the doctor may not even have been present at key points of the process?”Andrea continued.
 
However, a further Government revelation this week, suggests that the practice may already be widespread. Responding to a written question from Sir Edward Leigh MP, Public Health Minister, Jane Ellison MP, revealed that in 2012, in only 46% (83, 930) of abortions carried out under Ground C, had a doctor definitely met with the patient before authorising the abortion.
 
This suggests that in more than 96, 000 cases, no doctor had met with the women considering abortion.
 
Commenting, Andrea Williams said:
 
“Recent revelations of gender-related abortion and of the use of ‘pre-signed’ Abortion forms already suggests a level of contempt for proper process and has caused widespread shock. It is remarkable that instead of applying the law and pursuing prosecution, the Government seems happy to acquiesce in this blatant disregard and even to allow further liberalisation, by the back door, buried in regulations.
 
“The 1967 Abortion Act clearly and deliberately included the close involvement of doctors in both authorising and conducting abortion.This was to ensure that abortion was carried out only in the rarest of cases. The Act was never meant to pave the way for ‘abortion on demand’ which is effectively what this consultation encourages.

“There seems to be little regard for the seriousness of the abortion procedure for the women involved and the unborn child within them.

"Effectively encouraging the removal of doctors puts patients at risk medically and doctors and nurses at risk legally.”



ENDS.



For further information and interview requests:

Andrew Marsh 07919 354 456

Andrea Minichiello Williams 07712 591 164

Notes for Editors:
 

Details of the consultation are available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/independent-abortion-clinic-regulation


 

Twitter

  • ICYMI: "It's never in the best interests of a person for a doctor to help them kill themselves". Dr Peter Saunders… https://t.co/Mj2lLfTkwK 9 hours 18 min ago
  • "To see, or not to see, that is the question" - Jules Gomes looks at the hypocrisy in reactions to graphic imagery… https://t.co/YH4BIhauWt 10 hours 49 min ago
  • "Slippery slopes and incremental expansion" - Dr Peter Saunders was interviewed by BBC Radio Coventry & Warwickshir… https://t.co/FFwwPNKlAP 13 hours 56 min ago
  • Tim Dieppe spoke to LBC's Nick Ferrari about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome, raising ethical con… https://t.co/mPQT3mjpWq 16 hours 53 min ago
  • "It's never in the best interests of a person for a doctor to help them kill themselves". Dr Peter Saunders spoke t… https://t.co/QmbXNoHIQ8 19 hours 11 min ago

Subscribe to our emails